DQAF mission Mauritius 2011
From Ed-DQAF Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (1 revision) |
(category Mauritius created ; category Sadc deleted) |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
*MoE needs to liaise with the MoF to ensure that the dev of statistics for education are properly included in NSDS | *MoE needs to liaise with the MoF to ensure that the dev of statistics for education are properly included in NSDS | ||
| − | [[Category:Country]] [[Category: | + | [[Category:Country]] [[Category:Mauritius]] |
Latest revision as of 05:24, 15 October 2012
Contents |
FINDINGS OF THE DQAF
The major themes extrapolated from the situational analysis have been summarised and are presented below:
Strengths
- Professionalism
- Respect of Schedule
- Support from CSO and CISD
- Good collaboration / very dedicated behaviour from HT and Zones
Data quality issues
- Legal framework to updated in order to provide clear distribution of responsibilities
- Statistics acts, Data protection act, education act
- Pressure on private institutions
- Scope / lack of coordination with other bodies / Lack of statistical expertise
- TEC:
- TVET: pb of overlap with MoE
- Financial: a lot of information available, a lot to be done but needs not presented
- Response rate: quite good but could be improved monitoring the returns but more support from the MoE is needed
- Timeliness – EMIS confusion concept – expression of needs
- Accuracy / Reliability : Inconsistances in filling the questionnaire / Visits
- Meta data and information on available data
Access to available data
- Weakness of statistical system in terms of providing access to users
- Clarify the notion of EMIS
Capacities in Sector performance analysis to inform policy reforms
- Overload
- Staffing / institutional arrangements / Lack of research and evaluation unit
- Lack clear information needs expression
Management and micro planning issues
- Less constraints on quality but needs of real time data
- SAMS must be encourage / lot of frustration from the staff involved in its design.
- This would have allow improvement of management at all levels for improving efficiency of the system (though necessary decentralisation) and avoiding duplication
Overall Recommendations
- Participation to the current revision of stats act
- Improve communication with CSO, other education bodies and internally to the MoE
- Reinforce the capacity of the MoE in planning and strategic management
- Staff / Institutional arrangements: Research and analysis, positioning the EMIS structure at a strategic level in the organisation where it can serve all needs in the MoE including providing national statistics
- Reviving the EMIS Committee: Education sector M&E working group at sector level (MoE, CSO, …
- Ensuring production of quality national and sector statistics
(Assessing the needs, streamlining the data collection, benefiting from expertise of all participants)
- Production of regular materials based on evidence for informing strategic management
- Conduct an introductory CB exercise for ESA / desk review / Information needs inventory
- Side visits to school
- Improving access to data
- MoE needs to liaise with the MoF to ensure that the dev of statistics for education are properly included in NSDS